Insight
When funders wear multiple hats — as individual advocates as well as representatives of a funding organization — it can be unclear which role the funder is playing at any given time.
The power dynamic of the funder-grantee relationship is always present, even when the individuals from organizations are interacting in other contexts. If funders are also going to be active in the spaces where their grantees work, then they need to clearly communicate which role they are in, so as not to unintentionally overstep or blur the funder-grantee relationship.
“You can’t participate in civil society if you are a funder. You never get more than 50% of what is going on.”
The confusion was exacerbated by the fact that GCE saw itself as an “operational funder” (and still does as Luminate). This can be broadly defined as a funding organization that engages in direct advocacy as well as also supporting the policy and advocacy goals of organizations in the field.
Challenges arose when members of GCE’s staff were seen to be wearing multiple hats – as individual advocates as well as representatives of a funding organization. When individual staff express support for something, people hearing it are not always able to determine if the statement of support means 1) this is interesting work that someone should be doing that aligns with GCE’s priorities, 2) this is a priority for a direct operational play by GCE, or 3) this is critical to the social-political moment in general.
Some participants voiced concerns about funders also acting as advocates, as funders naturally have a position of power in the space and have access to knowledge not available to other advocates. Others pointed out that GCE’s success depended on its staff taking the time to develop very clear opinions and stances on particular issues, which naturally leads to a more “activist” position.
Quotes
“Social change is political.”
“What is the end game here? Building effective organizations, or political change through supporting organizations?”
“They really encourage their ILs to ask questions, talk to a lot of people, and dig into an issue before committing to a strategy and a set of grants.”
“This is [Luminate’s] moment. If they’re willing to step up, they could have huge potential in this sector.”
”[Luminate] has tremendous potential to be a major influence in the philanthropic and advocacy space and I encourage them to seize the moment!”
Related Recommendations
All Recommendations arrow_forwardRelated Resources
Decolonizing Wealth, Edgar Villaneuva
Decolonizing Wealth is a provocative analysis of the dysfunctional colonial dynamics at play in philanthropy and finance. Award-winning philanthropy executive Edgar Villanueva draws from the traditions from the Native way to prescribe the medicine for restoring balance and healing our divides.
BookA practical guide to outcome-focused philanthropy
A philanthropic framework that emphasizes rigor, results, learning, and adaptation. This guidebook and set of worksheets helps foundation staff integrate this approach across all stages of philanthropic work.
Knowledge Base
Source: Lori Grange, Hewlett FoundationEarning Trust in Sensitive Interviews
Honest conversations about sensitive topics can be challenging. This resource talks about how to consider the threat model and earn trust when the topic or context is sensitive.
Article
Source: Simply SecureOn Trust & Transparency: Full Report
Download the full report.
Report
Source: Simply SecureOn Trust & Transparency: Interview Guide
The interview guide used for the participant interviews during the Partner Perspectives project.
Report
Source: Simply SecureOn Trust & Transparency: Survey Guide
The survey guide used for the Partner Perspectives project. This was hosted in LimeSurvey an open-source survey tool that can be self-hosted or hosted via Limesurvey’s website.
Report
Source: Simply SecureOn Trust & Transparency: Funder Roles
Download the insight section on funder roles.
Report
Source: Simply Secure